Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

The place to comment on auctions or question authenticity.
Post Reply
User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Lately it seems that every man and his dog is out to make a fast buck selling Seiko 7A38's on eBay. One of the problems they're likely to encounter is the watch is missing its original bracelet. Seiko's folded-link construction bracelets from the 1980's are notoriously prone to stretching and failure, if not treated carefully. Most often it's the small 'U' section interconnecting pieces between the main links which let go. Some people sell them as a 'head only'. Some fit leather straps (which generally don't work well with hooded lugs). Others look for a suitable similar appearing bracelet (not always necessarily the correct lug fitting). Some more forthright eBay sellers disclose in their descriptions that such fitments aren't original. Then you have the dishonest kind. The classic deceit is to call it 'original bracelet'. It may in some cases, indeed be an original Seiko bracelet; just not correct or original to the recipient watch it's fitted it to !

Readers may recall a similarly titled thread in the eBay section of the old forum, which ran to 11 pages over 9 years:
Yet another 7Axx on an undisclosed non-original bracelet ....


I must admit, although I started out with my usual fervent enthusiasm, instances became so commonplace that towards the final years of the old forum, I didn't bother slating some of the more obvious examples of wilful misrepresentation. Seeing this deceptively described well-worn two-tone 7A38-7190, fitted with a non-original Seiko replacement bracelet, listed by an Italian eBay seller earlier this afternoon, raised my hackles enough to re-visit this thorny perennial subject.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-vintag ... 5178790011

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Listing.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Listing.png (174.05 KiB) Viewed 518 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-1.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-1.jpg (165.09 KiB) Viewed 521 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-4.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-4.jpg (169.4 KiB) Viewed 521 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-5.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-may2021-5.jpg (179.24 KiB) Viewed 521 times

The manner in which he's posted the description, in an almost illegible light grey font, beggars belief ! :o

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Description.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Description.png (9.15 KiB) Viewed 521 times

However, if you strain your eyes hard enough, the 6th line down falsely claims: 'Bracciale originale'.

I'm struggling at the moment to find a wrist shot of my own two-tone 7A38-7190 SAA054J, so here's an appropriately angled photo of an example fitted with the correct original Seiko p/n B1412C bracelet, which sold on eBay recently:

rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-ebay-may2021-4.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-ebay-may2021-4.jpg (165.64 KiB) Viewed 509 times

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Seiko7A38 wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 3:07 pmThen you have the dishonest kind. The classic deceit is to call it 'original bracelet'.

I must admit, although I started out with my usual fervent enthusiasm, instances became so commonplace that towards the final years of the old forum, I didn't bother slating some of the more obvious examples of wilful misrepresentation.
Whereas this next example can't be classed as wilful misrepresentation; it's more what I'd call deception by omission. Unfortunately it's equally common practice among unethical eBay sellers. In fact, I'd seen this same seller pull a very similar stunt with a non-working two-tone 7A38-7060, fitted with a non-original replacement bracelet, back in April.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-7A38-7 ... 4676314435

7A38-7060-Stainless+Gold-SilverFace-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-April2021-Ended-Sold-63Euros.png
7A38-7060-Stainless+Gold-SilverFace-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-April2021-Ended-Sold-63Euros.png (52.1 KiB) Viewed 467 times

Apart from the fact I was busy writing other topics at the time, I decided the comparatively low selling price wasn't worth mentioning and let it slide. But when eBay sellers are asking 400 Euros for more sought-after models, like this, something needs to be said. This well-worn stainless 7A38-7020, fitted with a non-original replacement bracelet was listed earlier this morning by another of the regular band of profiteering German eBay sellers - tamers-timepieces.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-7A38-7 ... 4760242003

7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Listing.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Listing.png (189.07 KiB) Viewed 485 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-1.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-1.jpg (100.79 KiB) Viewed 461 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-4.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-4.jpg (238.44 KiB) Viewed 461 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-6.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-6.jpg (203.35 KiB) Viewed 463 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-7.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-7.jpg (240 KiB) Viewed 463 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Description.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Description.png (17.03 KiB) Viewed 485 times

The 'strap', viz: incorrect replacement bracelet, is of course the ubiquitous Seiko p/n Z1357S which doesn't particularly suit or fit the 7A38-702x watch case well at the best of times. Looks like some botcher has had a go at the connecting link on the 12 o'clock side with a pair of pliers, in a failed effort to pull it in closer. :roll:

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Knowing how popular these are (regardless of condition), I wasn't surprised to see that well-worn stainless 7A38-7020, fitted with a non-original p/n Z1357S bracelet, had already been sold yesterday evening for an undisclosed best offer.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/124760242003

7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png (48.89 KiB) Viewed 454 times

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

This 7A38-7070, fitted with an undisclosed non-original replacement Seiko bracelet, was listed earlier today, by the same Italian eBay seller senatore53 who also listed the 7A38-7010 Franken (which coincidentally also happens to be fitted with a non-original bracelet). He falsely describes it as being “Perfette condizioni” and 'Solo oggetti originali…!' which translates as Only original items…! - and neither of which are true.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-7A38-7 ... 4051432127

7A38-7070-(Divers)-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Listing.png
7A38-7070-(Divers)-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Listing.png (149.06 KiB) Viewed 390 times
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-3.jpg
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-3.jpg (96.38 KiB) Viewed 377 times
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-4.jpg
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-4.jpg (98.16 KiB) Viewed 377 times
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-5.jpg
rsz_7a38-7070-divers-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-5.jpg (147.14 KiB) Viewed 377 times
7A38-7070-(Divers)-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Description.png
7A38-7070-(Divers)-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Description.png (50.66 KiB) Viewed 390 times

His first 3 photos, which might have shown the bracelet more clearly, are badly out of focus (possibly deliberately), but the last two reveal it's actually a Seiko p/n B1075S (normally found on the 7A28-7040 / -7049), rather than the correct p/n B1241S. It's also fitted with a strange fold-over clasp (similar to the style used on the titanium 7A28-7080), rather than the correct 7-hole adjustment SQ clasp. Clearly someone who has no qualms about passing off his dross as genuine.

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

I'm sick and tired (and no doubt wasting my breath) of bitching about speculative over-pricing, particularly by greedy Italian eBay sellers. But it makes me see red when they chuck an undisclosed non-original bracelet into the 'bargain'. :x This certainly not 'VERY RARE', but common-or-garden stainless 7A38-7270 was listed by one such in the early hours of this morning, as a 7-day auction with an opening bid price of 450 Euros !

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/VERY-RARE-SE ... 4094727843

7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Listing.png
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Listing.png (117.79 KiB) Viewed 300 times
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-1.jpg
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-1.jpg (183.46 KiB) Viewed 300 times
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-2.jpg
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-2.jpg (181.61 KiB) Viewed 300 times
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-3.jpg
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-3.jpg (234.58 KiB) Viewed 300 times
rsz_7a38-7270-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-4.jpg
rsz_7a38-7270-stainless-blackface-wrongbracelet-ebay-june2021-4.jpg (237.25 KiB) Viewed 300 times
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-5.jpg
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-5.jpg (186.35 KiB) Viewed 300 times
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Description.png
7A38-7270-Stainless-BlackFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-June2021-Description.png (3.95 KiB) Viewed 300 times

When I first glanced at the listing photos, I thought it might be the same stainless 7A38-7270, fitted with an incorrect replacement bracelet, that had been 'doing the rounds' on eBay Italy in 2019 and 2020. Checking my photo library, it isn't. This one's wrong bracelet is even thinner. It was probably donated by a 70's era Seiko digital. I can't quite discern the part number stampings on the bracelet connecting tubes in the seller's case-back photo. If you're in any doubt as to what the correct Seiko p/n B1615S bracelet looks like, here's a re-post of my photo from the WRUW thread:

rsz_p1710028-crop.jpg
rsz_p1710028-crop.jpg (244.61 KiB) Viewed 297 times

Oh and judging by the incorrect font of the SEIKO logo on their 'nuova scatola', I strongly suspect that cheap looking plastic presentation box once contained a FEIKO !! :lol:

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Seiko7A38 wrote: Mon Jun 07, 2021 8:11 am Knowing how popular these are (regardless of condition), I wasn't surprised to see that well-worn stainless 7A38-7020, fitted with a non-original p/n Z1357S bracelet, had already been sold yesterday evening for an undisclosed best offer.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/124760242003

7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay(Germany)-June2021-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png (48.89 KiB) Viewed 277 times
That same well-worn stainless 7A38-7020, fitted with a non-original p/n Z1357S bracelet has just re-appeared, listed this afternoon by a would-be profiteering UK eBay re-seller, who's asking £425 as a Buy-it-Now. Rather cheekily, he hasn't bothered taking his own photos and instead is lazily re-using the previous German eBay seller's same set of 7, uploaded in a smaller size direct from his camera phone.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-7a38-7 ... 4919960560

7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Listing.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Listing.png (115.6 KiB) Viewed 278 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-1.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-1.jpg (82.49 KiB) Viewed 275 times
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-7.jpg
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-7.jpg (148.65 KiB) Viewed 275 times

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Almost inevitable, given the 'Royal Oak' misnomer hype and seemingly incessant demand, regardless of condition. :roll: Checking my eBay watching page, I see that well-worn stainless 7A38-7020, fitted with a non-original p/n Z1357S bracelet, (re)sold late yesterday evening - again for an undisclosed best offer.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/184919960560

7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png
7A38-7020-Stainless+Grey-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Ended-Sold-BestOffer.png (27.19 KiB) Viewed 255 times

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

By coincidence, we'd recently been discussing the 7A38-7000 and 7A38-7190 gold-tone variants in a couple of other threads when forum member Jim, who's admittedly a novice 7Axx collector, wrote this comment in the WRUW thread:
jamesam wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 5:40 pmMy untrained eyes have difficulty identifying the difference between the gold tone 7A38-7000 and 7A38-7190 ....
Well this gold-tone 7A38-7190, fitted with a non-original replacement bracelet, that bears a passing resemblance to the p/n B1170G fitted to the gold-tone 7A38-7000 will probably serve to add to his confusion. Sorry, Jim. :P It was listed in the early hours of this morning, by a 'Royal Oak' keyword spamming, flagrantly dishonest Indonesian eBay seller who falsely claims that it comprises 'All original part'. Apart from the wrong bracelet, check out the hour hand fitted. :roll: Thankfully, he's priced it stupidly high enough @ $400 to deter all but the most foolhardy punters.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/RARE-Se-iko- ... 3818172956

7A38-7190-Gold-GoldFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-Listing.jpg
7A38-7190-Gold-GoldFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-Listing.jpg (130.59 KiB) Viewed 180 times
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-1.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-1.jpg (235.73 KiB) Viewed 171 times
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-4.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-4.jpg (223.22 KiB) Viewed 171 times
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-5.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-gold-goldface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-5.jpg (252.6 KiB) Viewed 171 times
7A38-7190-Gold-GoldFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-Description.png
7A38-7190-Gold-GoldFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-Description.png (15.33 KiB) Viewed 180 times

The incorrect replacement bracelet appears to be a Seiko p/n B1011G. No idea what model that's originally off. If you need a reminder of what the correct p/n B1405G bracelet looks like, check out my recent post in the WRUW thread.

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Seiko7A38 wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 3:07 pm Lately it seems that every man and his dog is out to make a fast buck selling Seiko 7A38's on eBay.
Before I begin my latest rant about the unashamed greed of profiteering eBay sellers, I'll state that it was purely by coincidence that I happened to start this thread with this particular 7A38-7190, fitted with a non-original bracelet.
Seiko7A38 wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 3:07 pmI must admit, although I started out with my usual fervent enthusiasm, instances became so commonplace that towards the final years of the old forum, I didn't bother slating some of the more obvious examples of wilful misrepresentation. Seeing this deceptively described well-worn two-tone 7A38-7190, fitted with a non-original Seiko replacement bracelet, listed by an Italian eBay seller earlier this afternoon, raised my hackles enough to re-visit this thorny perennial subject.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Seiko-vintag ... 5178790011

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Listing.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Listing.png (174.05 KiB) Viewed 140 times
I'd deliberately delayed posting an update to my original post, for reasons which will become apparent. The Italian eBay seller subsequently made 3 revisions to his listing, reducing the Buy-it-Now price by 10 Euro decrements to 180 Euros.

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Revisions.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Revisions.png (17.99 KiB) Viewed 114 times

On 10th July, he ended the listing as allegedly no longer available, pointing to his having accepted a 'back door' offer.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265178790011

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Ended-NLA.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-May2021-Ended-NLA.png (42.87 KiB) Viewed 135 times

Raise my hackles ? Seeing this sort of thing REALLY p!sses me off ! I must admit I was half expecting to see it re-appear, listed by another Italian seller. Instead, it rocked up on eBay again (as I knew it would) 10 days later, listed by a greedy UK profiteering re-seller hollizaak007, with a ridiculously marked-up Buy-it-Now price of £355 !!! :x

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Stunning-Vin ... 4953326222

7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Listing.png
7A38-7190-Stainless+Gold-GreyFace-WrongBracelet-eBay-July2021-(re-seller)-Listing.png (174.31 KiB) Viewed 135 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-1.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-1.jpg (223.26 KiB) Viewed 135 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-6.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-6.jpg (245.09 KiB) Viewed 135 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-7.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-7.jpg (245.06 KiB) Viewed 135 times
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-8.jpg
rsz_7a38-7190-stainless-gold-greyface-wrongbracelet-ebay-july2021-re-seller-8.jpg (242.61 KiB) Viewed 135 times

Although the previous Italian seller didn't include a photo of the case-back showing the serial number, which would have categorically proven so, it's easily recognizable as being the same watch, from the incorrect replacement Seiko bracelet fitted. Zooming in on the re-sellers photo of the case-back it appears to have p/n B1408 stamped in one fixing tube, making it a B1408C. No idea what it's off - likely a 1980's Seiko Ana-digi.

User avatar
Seiko7A38
Site Admin
Posts: 811
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2021 12:05 pm
Location: S.W. England
Contact:

Re: Yet another mis-represented non-original replacement bracelet

Post by Seiko7A38 »

Seiko7A38 wrote: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:07 pmBefore I begin my latest rant about the unashamed greed of profiteering eBay sellers ....
In case you haven't seen the thread, check out the other recent activity by this greedy profiteering UK eBay re-seller.

Post Reply